laws on shooting dogs?

This forum is for general discussion that doesn't fit in the other topic-specific forums.
DuCkCoMaNdEr
Veteran
Posts: 132
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 8:23 pm
Location: Rankin County

laws on shooting dogs?

Postby DuCkCoMaNdEr » Thu Sep 12, 2013 4:29 pm

I have had an incident and was trying to find some laws on what you can and cant do when it comes to dogs. Is there anywhere to find actual written laws on this type of thing for in Mississippi? Thanks if anyone can help
User avatar
randywallace
Veteran
Posts: 698
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 2:43 pm

Re: laws on shooting dogs?

Postby randywallace » Thu Sep 12, 2013 5:27 pm

DuCkCoMaNdEr wrote:I have had an incident and was trying to find some laws on what you can and cant do when it comes to dogs. Is there anywhere to find actual written laws on this type of thing for in Mississippi? Thanks if anyone can help
2 main statutes involved. It is possible to end up in a pile of trouble for killing another person's dog.


§ 97-41-16. Mississippi Dog and Cat Pet Protection Law of 2011; legislative intent; simple cruelty; aggravated cruelty; penalty; restitution; activities not constituting cruelty to dog or cat; immunity for good faith reporting of suspected cruelty; registration of organizations that have purpose of protection of or prevention of cruelty to dogs and cats


(1) (a) The provisions of this section shall be known and may be cited as the "Mississippi Dog and Cat Pet Protection Law of 2011."

(b) The intent of the Legislature in enacting this law is to provide only for the protection of domesticated dogs and cats, as these are the animals most often serving as the loyal and beloved pets of the citizens of this state. Animals other than domesticated dogs and cats are specifically excluded from the enhanced protection described in this section for dogs and cats. The provisions of this section do not apply, and shall not be construed as applying, to any animal other than a domesticated dog or cat.

(2) (a) If a person shall intentionally or with criminal negligence wound, deprive of adequate shelter, food or water, or carry or confine in a cruel manner, any domesticated dog or cat, or cause any person to do the same, then he or she shall be guilty of the offense of simple cruelty to a dog or cat. A person who is convicted of the offense of simple cruelty to a dog or cat shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and fined not more than One Thousand Dollars ($ 1,000.00), or imprisoned not more than six (6) months, or both.

(b) If a person with malice shall intentionally torture, mutilate, maim, burn, starve or disfigure any domesticated dog or cat, or cause any person to do the same, then he or she shall be guilty of the offense of aggravated cruelty to a dog or cat.

(i) A person who is convicted of a first offense of aggravated cruelty to a dog or cat shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and fined not more than Two Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($ 2,500.00), or imprisoned for not more than six (6) months, or both.

(ii) A person who is convicted of a second or subsequent offense of aggravated cruelty to a dog or cat, the offenses being committed within a period of five (5) years, shall be guilty of a felony and fined not more than Five Thousand Dollars ($ 5,000.00) and imprisoned for not less than one (1) year nor more than five (5) years.

(c) A conviction entered upon a plea of nolo contendere to a charge of aggravated cruelty to a dog or cat shall be counted as a conviction for the purpose of determining whether a later conviction is a first or subsequent offense.

(d) For purposes of this section, one or more alleged acts of the offenses of simple cruelty to a dog or cat or aggravated cruelty to a dog or cat, committed against one or more domesticated dogs or cats, or any combination thereof, shall constitute a single offense if the alleged acts occurred at the same time.

(3) In addition to such fine or imprisonment which may be imposed:

(a) The court shall order that restitution be made to the owner of such dog or cat. The measure for restitution in money shall be the current replacement value of such loss and the actual veterinarian fees, medicine, special supplies, loss of income and other cost s incurred as a result of actions in violation of subsection (2) of this section; and

(b) The court may order that:

(i) The reasonable costs of sheltering, transporting and rehabilitating the dog or cat, and any other costs directly related to the care of the dog or cat, be reimbursed to:

1. Any law enforcement agency; or

2. Any agency or department of a political subdivision that is charged with the control, protection or welfare of dogs or cats within the subdivision. The agency or department may reimburse a nongovernmental organization for such costs, if the organization possesses nonprofit status under the United States Internal Revenue Code and has the purpose of protecting the welfare of, or preventing cruelty to, dogs or cats.

(ii) The person convicted:

1. Receive a psychiatric or psychological evaluation and counseling or treatment for a length of time as prescribed by the court. The cost of any evaluation, counseling and treatment shall be paid by the offender upon order of the court, up to a maximum amount that is no more than the jurisdictional limit of the sentencing court.

2. Perform community service for a period not exceeding the applicable maximum term of imprisonment that may be imposed for conviction of the offense.

3. Be enjoined from employment in any position that involves the care of a dog or cat, or in any place where dogs or cats are kept or confined, for a period which the court deems appropriate.

(4) (a) Nothing in this section shall be construed as prohibiting a person from:

(i) Defending himself or herself or another person from physical or economic injury being threatened or caused by a dog or cat.

(ii) Injuring or killing an unconfined dog or cat on the property of the person, if the unconfined dog or cat is believed to constitute a threat of physical injury or damage to any domesticated animal under the care or control of such person.

(iii) Acting under the provisions of Section 95-5-19 to protect poultry or livestock from a trespassing dog that is in the act of chasing or killing the poultry or livestock, or acting to protect poultry or livestock from a trespassing cat that is in the act of chasing or killing the poultry or livestock.

(iv) Engaging in practices that are licensed or lawful under the Mississippi Veterinary Practice Act, Section 73-39-51 et seq., or engaging in activities by any licensed veterinarian while following accepted standards of practice of the profession within the State of Mississippi, including the euthanizing of a dog or cat.

(v) Rendering emergency care, treatment, or assistance to a dog or cat that is abandoned, ill, injured, or in distress, if the person rendering the care, treatment, or assistance is acting in good faith.

(vi) Performing activities associated with accepted agricultural and animal husbandry practices with regard to livestock, poultry or other animals, including those activities which involve:

1. Using dogs in such practices.

2. Raising, managing and using animals to provide food, fiber or transportation.

3. Butchering animals and processing food.

(vii) Training for, or participating in, a rodeo, equine activity, dog show, event sponsored by a kennel club or other bona fide organization that promotes the breeding or showing of dogs or cats, or any other competitive event which involves the lawful use of dogs or cats.

(viii) Engaging in accepted practices of dog or cat identification.

(ix) Engaging in lawful activities that are regulated by the Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Parks or the Mississippi Department of Marine Resources, including without limitation, hunting, trapping, fishing, and wildlife and seafood management.

(x) Performing scientific, research, medical and zoological activities undertaken by research and education facilities or institutions that are:

1. Regulated under the provisions of the Animal Welfare Act, 7 USCS 2131 et seq., as in effect on July 1, 2011;

2. Regulated under the provisions of the Health Research Extension Act of 1985, Public Law No. 99-158; or

3. Subject to any other applicable state or federal law or regulation governing animal research as in effect on July 1, 2011.

(xi) Disposing of or destroying certain dogs under authority of Sections 19-5-50, 21-19-9 and 41-53-11, which allow counties, municipalities and certain law enforcement officers to destroy dogs running at large without proper identification indicating that such dogs have been vaccinated for rabies.

(xii) Engaging in professional pest control activities, including those activities governed by the Mississippi Pesticide Law of 1975, Section 69-23-1 et seq.; professional services related to entomology, plant pathology, horticulture, tree surgery, weed control or soil classification, as regulated under Section 69-19-1 et seq.; and any other pest control activities conducted in accordance with state law.

(xiii) Performing the humane euthanization of a dog or cat pursuant to Section 97-41-3.

(b) If the owner or person in control of a dog or cat is precluded, by natural or other causes beyond his reasonable control, from acting to prevent an act or omission that might otherwise constitute an allegation of the offense of simple cruelty to a dog or cat or the offense of aggravated cruelty to a dog or cat, then that person shall not be guilty of the offense. Natural or other causes beyond the reasonable control of the person include, without limitation, acts of God, declarations of disaster, emergencies, acts of war, earthquakes, hurricanes, tornadoes, fires, floods or other natural disasters.

(5) The provisions of this section shall not be construed to:

(a) Apply to any animal other than a dog or cat.

(b) Create any civil or criminal liability on the part of the driver of a motor vehicle if the driver unintentionally injures or kills a dog or cat as a result of the dog or cat being accidentally hit by the vehicle.

(6) (a) Except as otherwise provided in Section 97-35-47 for the false reporting of a crime, a person, who in good faith and acting without malice, reports a suspected incident of simple cruelty to a dog or cat, or aggravated cruelty to a dog or cat, to a local animal control, protection or welfare organization, a local law enforcement agency, or the Mississippi Department of Public Safety, shall be immune from civil and criminal liability for reporting the incident.

(b) A veterinarian licensed in Mississippi or a person acting at the direction of a veterinarian licensed in Mississippi, who in good faith and acting without malice, participates in the investigation of an alleged offense of simple or aggravated cruelty to a dog or cat, or makes a decision or renders services regarding the care of a dog or cat that is involved in the investigation, shall be immune from civil and criminal liability for those acts.

(7) Other than an agency or department of a political subdivision that is charged with the control, protection or welfare of dogs or cats within the subdivision, any organization that has the purpose of protecting the welfare of, or preventing cruelty to, dogs or cats, shall register the organization with the sheriff of the county in which the organization operates a physical facility for the protection, welfare or shelter of dogs or cats, on or before the first day of October each year. The provisions of this subsection (7) shall apply to any organization that has the purpose of protecting the welfare of dogs or cats, or preventing cruelty to dogs or cats, regardless of whether the organization also protects animals other than dogs or cats.

(8) Nothing in this section shall limit the authority of a municipality or board of supervisors to adopt ordinances, rules, regulations or resolutions which may be, in whole or in part, more restrictive than the provisions of this section, and in those cases, the more restrictive ordinances, rules, regulations or resolutions will govern.

HISTORY: SOURCES: Laws, 1993, ch. 438, § 3; Laws, 2006, ch. 491, § 1; Laws, 2011, ch. 536, § 1, eff from and after passage (approved Apr. 26, 2011.)




§ 69-29-15. Unlawful removal of any collar, tag, or marking device on an animal without permission of owner; penalties


It shall be unlawful for a person to remove any collar, tag or marking device on any animal not owned by such person and without the permission of the owner of the animal. Any person violating the provisions of this section, upon conviction for a first violation, shall be punished by a fine of not less than Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($ 250.00) nor more than One Thousand Dollars ($ 1,000.00) or by imprisonment in the county jail for not more than six (6) months, or by both. Any person violating the provisions of this section, upon conviction for a second or subsequent violation, shall be punished by imprisonment in the Penitentiary for not less than one (1) year or a fine of not less than One Thousand Dollars ($ 1,000.00), or by both.

HISTORY: SOURCES: Laws, 1994, ch. 605, § 2, eff from and after July 1, 1994.
DuCkCoMaNdEr
Veteran
Posts: 132
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 8:23 pm
Location: Rankin County

Re: laws on shooting dogs?

Postby DuCkCoMaNdEr » Thu Sep 12, 2013 5:42 pm

Thanks, that is what I was looking for.
User avatar
Northbigmuddy
Veteran
Posts: 769
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:51 am

Re: laws on shooting dogs?

Postby Northbigmuddy » Fri Sep 13, 2013 5:49 am

They tried to get an unconfined dog in your pick up bed included as animal cruelty. Think it was the Humane Society that was the driving force behind the 2011 law.
USA Back to Back World War Champs
User avatar
Smoke68
Duck South Addict
Posts: 1731
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 10:51 am
Location: Starkville

Re: laws on shooting dogs?

Postby Smoke68 » Fri Sep 13, 2013 9:26 am

Northbigmuddy wrote:They tried to get an unconfined dog in your pick up bed included as animal cruelty. Think it was the Humane Society that was the driving force behind the 2011 law.
It made its way into the animal ordinance in Starkville. My dog rides in the bed wherever I go, and nobody's said nothing yet. I'm guessing it would only come into play if he jumped out and caused trouble or got hurt.
Image
"Well we don't rent pigs and I figure it's better to say it right out front because a man that does like to rent pigs is... he's hard to stop" -Augustus McRae
User avatar
Northbigmuddy
Veteran
Posts: 769
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:51 am

Re: laws on shooting dogs?

Postby Northbigmuddy » Fri Sep 13, 2013 1:01 pm

Smoke68 wrote:
Northbigmuddy wrote:They tried to get an unconfined dog in your pick up bed included as animal cruelty. Think it was the Humane Society that was the driving force behind the 2011 law.
It made its way into the animal ordinance in Starkville. My dog rides in the bed wherever I go, and nobody's said nothing yet. I'm guessing it would only come into play if he jumped out and caused trouble or got hurt.
I dont know or care about similiar laws in my area. Ill cross that bridge when the fugly hopeless gelatinous shelter dog owning woman in the beat up Prius decides to bring it up.
USA Back to Back World War Champs
User avatar
stang67
Duck South Addict
Posts: 2981
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005 9:05 am
Location: LA

Re: laws on shooting dogs?

Postby stang67 » Fri Sep 13, 2013 1:41 pm

It IS cruel to ride around town with your dog in the bed unsecured. The pooch may enjoy it, but you're putting them at risk unnecessarily. Whether there should be laws for that is another debate.
SWAG
Duck South Addict
Posts: 3209
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2003 1:07 pm
Location: TALLAHATCHIE COUNTY

Re: laws on shooting dogs?

Postby SWAG » Fri Sep 13, 2013 2:08 pm

stang67 wrote:It IS cruel to ride around town with your dog in the bed unsecured. The pooch may enjoy it, but you're putting them at risk unnecessarily. Whether there should be laws for that is another debate.
Some dogs...some not. Dogs are as individual as we people are. I have seen MANY labs who have lived long fruitful lives and spent much of their time in the back of their master's truck (usually spend a lot of time in the cab as well....and house). I have also seen some dogs who have not been given time nor attention who may as well have been walking a tight rope as they had ride in the back of a truck. A broad statement that says "it is cruel for a dog to ride in a truck bed unsecured" is wrong IMO. To each his own.
Are we gonna get wet?
User avatar
stang67
Duck South Addict
Posts: 2981
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005 9:05 am
Location: LA

Re: laws on shooting dogs?

Postby stang67 » Fri Sep 13, 2013 2:25 pm

So only hyperactive, disobedient children need seatbelts?

I am not talking about them at risk from being hyper and wanting to jump from the truck. I'm talking about the fact that they are more apt to live thru a collision if kenneled.

Loose and not kenneled is putting them at an unnecessary risk. End of story. Some are just willing to accept that risk. I don't see a reason to.
User avatar
Northbigmuddy
Veteran
Posts: 769
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:51 am

Re: laws on shooting dogs?

Postby Northbigmuddy » Fri Sep 13, 2013 2:45 pm

stang67 wrote:So only hyperactive, disobedient children need seatbelts?

I am not talking about them at risk from being hyper and wanting to jump from the truck. I'm talking about the fact that they are more apt to live thru a collision if kenneled.

Loose and not kenneled is putting them at an unnecessary risk. End of story. Some are just willing to accept that risk. I don't see a reason to.

You should get one of these...
Image
USA Back to Back World War Champs
User avatar
Dux Be Us
Duck South Addict
Posts: 1618
Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2009 9:10 pm
Location: Walls,MS

Re: laws on shooting dogs?

Postby Dux Be Us » Fri Sep 13, 2013 2:46 pm

stang67 wrote:
Loose and not kenneled is putting them at an unnecessary risk.

Ditto...and, I see no reason to shoot a dog unless it is a direct threat to a person or livestock....just my opinion. Now those pesky baby seals are another story all togather :wink:
" You get what you put in, and people get what they deserve" Hank Jr. and Kid Rock
User avatar
stang67
Duck South Addict
Posts: 2981
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005 9:05 am
Location: LA

Re: laws on shooting dogs?

Postby stang67 » Fri Sep 13, 2013 3:46 pm

Northbigmuddy wrote: You should get one of these...
It's about a million times cooler than a shovel. :wink:
User avatar
DoublePslayer
Veteran
Posts: 879
Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 10:16 am
Location: Tillatoba, Ms.

Re: laws on shooting dogs?

Postby DoublePslayer » Fri Sep 13, 2013 7:46 pm

DuCkCoMaNdEr wrote:I have had an incident and was trying to find some laws on what you can and cant do when it comes to dogs. Is there anywhere to find actual written laws on this type of thing for in Mississippi? Thanks if anyone can help
Go by yourself. Pull the trigger. Don't tell anybody!!!!!!!
End of story.
De inimico non loquaris male, sed cogites
Carry the battle to them. Don't let them bring it to you. Put them on the defensive and don't ever apologize for anything." Harry S. Truman
bmaskew04
Veteran
Posts: 171
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 3:57 pm
Location: Ellisville, MS

Re: laws on shooting dogs?

Postby bmaskew04 » Fri Sep 13, 2013 8:51 pm

I'm not all about shooting another mans dog, but after picking up trash out of my driveway 3 or 4 mornings in a row I find it very tempting!!
"Is he really doing snow angels in the parking lot of Flatlands??...
Hail State
User avatar
MudHog
Duck South Sponsor
Posts: 7954
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 1:15 pm
Location: New Iberia, LA

Re: laws on shooting dogs?

Postby MudHog » Fri Sep 13, 2013 9:28 pm

I'm just asking a question here and not must say that I am a person who drove my lab around in the truck, but I had a gooseneck ball and a short leash that kept her just up against the bed rail. My question, those guys who put their dog INSIDE a pet taxi of kennel, is that pet taxi or kennel secured to the truck in any way? If not, have you ever thought that your trapping your dog inside a crate in the event of a crash? Granted the dog may not survive a crash where the crate gets thrown, but it is still a hard thing to swallow for me. Now, I would feel much better knowing that the crate is secured to the truck, but just how many people actually secure them?

Again, I know it is a very fine line about what is safe and what is not safe. Yes, I've seen farm dogs riding on the trunk of a crown vic travelling the dirt roads in Welsh. Does that make it right? Who is one to judge on what IS right or what IS wrong?
"I hear they are developing a new fighter specially for fighting in the middle east. It's called the F-U!" - crow, Aug. 2008

Member FLHC

Lane Romero

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests