Might as well get hammer back in here to explain to us the proper procedures for summary judgment for internet defamation....peewee wrote:We need to let Benny back to intervene on this thread. That's would be awesome.
99beers wrote:If I had to pick a side here, it sure wouldn't be Rice. He's lucky at this point something has not been broken. It will catch up with him.........
Take money when you win.........(he said he got a new ride) then don't pay when you lose. Get cut off until you pay up. You don't. Get another book from a friend, new cycle.........
And....to talk about your supposed gambling winnings on a public forum, is just plain stupid. Brag about it in fact. Not smart.
Why we give a $#!+ about gambling in this country is beyond me.Seymore wrote:I don't know anything regarding the criminality of gambling either on the State or Federal level. However, I do know that financial institutions have strict guidelines for following gambling proceeds being deposited in the institution. Especially if money is being moved from offshore. It's called money laundering and bank's are required by Federal regulation to report those accounts and people involved. They have software to mine transaction information called anomalies of suspected accounts. If I were still in banking and either of these cats had any accounts at the bank I worked for, you can bet your booty the first thing I'd be doing Monday morning is calling the internal auditors. Just something else to consider before airing the dirty laundry all over the internet.
On a personal note it certainly has livened the place up. I'm going to go get some popcorn now.
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot] and 9 guests
