Postby Dutch Dog » Fri Oct 05, 2007 12:08 pm
Of the 3 candidates, he got the most votes. I guess is how I should have stated it. Yes, I agree that 57% didn't vote for him, but voting isn't about who doesn't get the most votes, it's who DOES get the most votes. The same could be said about any 2 of the 3 candidates. Lets say (and I don't know the exact figures here) but Chumney got 30% and that other fella got 27% and WW got 47% Well, 77 % of the folks voted against the other fella Chumney's 30% plus WW's 47% = 77%. So should Chumney and WW have a run-off.
It's better to have it and not need it, than need it and not have it.