Page 2 of 4

Re: Missouri shooting thoughts??.

Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2014 8:16 am
by teul2

Re: Missouri shooting thoughts??.

Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2014 8:42 am
by MemphisStockBroker
joel, you shouldnt confuse people with the facts.... how folks feel is more important than the facts of what really happened.

Re: Missouri shooting thoughts??.

Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2014 8:52 am
by duramax
All I know is that it must suck to be an upstanding, common sense black person during these times. Anyone with an open mind can see this is an open and shut case. But if a black person took the side of the cop who shot the guy, jeez they'd be call an house nagger, and lambasted by other people of their race.

Re: Missouri shooting thoughts??.

Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2014 1:32 pm
by edub20

Re: Missouri shooting thoughts??.

Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2014 1:39 pm
by slayem
And finally, ask yourself: “Self, how will your stealing seven bottles of Mad Dog 20/20 bring about justice?”

Re: Missouri shooting thoughts??.

Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2014 2:14 pm
by kb7722
Fixed it for you. And I agree.
teul2 wrote:That 18 year old adult wrote his death warrant when he went to wrestle for the cops gun.

Re: Missouri shooting thoughts??.

Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2014 8:25 pm
by lipsplitter39654
a couple things. First of all this will likely go to trial, a civil rights trial in FEDERAL court. it wont be a local 70% black jury. they will never ever convict him in federal court. The size of Mike Brown will come into play, the fact that he was 290 pounds and 18 years old will come into play. The fact that he just robbed a store WILL come into play, a victim and that is what he will be classified as in federal court, a victims past history will be admissible in court, not the suspects(officer Wilson). The fact that he just robbed a store will come into play and the video will be shown. IT will show his demeanor and state of mind after the robbery. Whether or not Wilson knew about the robbery you can damn well bet that BIG MIKE thought that the officer knew and that is why he thought he was being stopped. He was likely hi on something and before the officer could get out of the car he attacked him. Most likely he was overpowering the officer and that is why the multiple shots. A couple issues that will come into play. Even if he was fleeing he was at the time a fleeing DANGEROUS felon. LE officers can shoot an unarmed fleeing felon IF he is a danger to the public. I would think a suspect that just robbed a store and assaulted a police officer would be considered a dangerous fleeing felon. The us attorneys office has a horrible track record of convicting cops for civil rights violations. There is no way that you will get a unanimous jury verdict against a police officer for this incident. Additionally a couple other things trouble me. Mostly why in the hell is the guy with him( darian Johnson) fella not being charged and locked up for the strong arm robbery, BIG MIKE handed him the cigars in the store, that's either conspiracy to commit robbery or accessory to robbery. He knew what happened. That sorry ass governor Jay Nixon needs to be impeached. How in the hell with 83% white population did he get elected and why is he kissing their asses in MO? Lastly the looters, Jessie Jackson, al Sharpton etc etc etc need their asses locked up if they continue this crap. Why in the hell are they being allowed to burn down a city? Our country has gone to hell the last few years. 40 FBI Agents investigating this and our border is wide open. Oh yeah another thing. Some of you go out and set a ball or melon or pumpkin or whatever up and try to shoot the top of it. The fatal wound entered the top of Big Mikes head. how could this have been done at a distance? what truly happened is he was whipping the officers ass in the patrol car and he got his ass shot off. Sorry for the rant.

Re: Missouri shooting thoughts??.

Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2014 1:32 pm
by kb7722
lipsplitter39654 wrote:a couple things. First of all this will likely go to trial, a civil rights trial in FEDERAL court. it wont be a local 70% black jury. they will never ever convict him in federal court. The size of Mike Brown will come into play, the fact that he was 290 pounds and 18 years old will come into play. The fact that he just robbed a store WILL come into play, a victim and that is what he will be classified as in federal court, a victims past history will be admissible in court, not the suspects(officer Wilson). The fact that he just robbed a store will come into play and the video will be shown. IT will show his demeanor and state of mind after the robbery. Whether or not Wilson knew about the robbery you can damn well bet that BIG MIKE thought that the officer knew and that is why he thought he was being stopped. He was likely hi on something and before the officer could get out of the car he attacked him. Most likely he was overpowering the officer and that is why the multiple shots. A couple issues that will come into play. Even if he was fleeing he was at the time a fleeing DANGEROUS felon. LE officers can shoot an unarmed fleeing felon IF he is a danger to the public. I would think a suspect that just robbed a store and assaulted a police officer would be considered a dangerous fleeing felon. The us attorneys office has a horrible track record of convicting cops for civil rights violations. There is no way that you will get a unanimous jury verdict against a police officer for this incident. Additionally a couple other things trouble me. Mostly why in the hell is the guy with him( darian Johnson) fella not being charged and locked up for the strong arm robbery, BIG MIKE handed him the cigars in the store, that's either conspiracy to commit robbery or accessory to robbery. He knew what happened. That sorry booty governor Jay Nixon needs to be impeached. How in the hell with 83% white population did he get elected and why is he kissing their asses in MO? Lastly the looters, Jessie Jackson, al Sharpton etc etc etc need their asses locked up if they continue this crap. Why in the hell are they being allowed to burn down a city? Our country has gone to hell the last few years. 40 FBI Agents investigating this and our border is wide open. Oh yeah another thing. Some of you go out and set a ball or melon or pumpkin or whatever up and try to shoot the top of it. The fatal wound entered the top of Big Mikes head. how could this have been done at a distance? what truly happened is he was whipping the officers booty in the patrol car and he got his booty shot off. Sorry for the rant.

Even if the cop is not convicted, his life will never be the same.

Re: Missouri shooting thoughts??.

Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2014 2:06 pm
by 420 racin
Well, it's probably going to get worse now...
http://news.yahoo.com/ferguson-protests ... 10733.html

Two cops just shot and killed another black dude...but this one was armed with a knife.....but he was an angel nonetheless and didn't deserve to die that way (Sarcasm)

Re: Missouri shooting thoughts??.

Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2014 6:51 pm
by southdeltan
lilwhitelie wrote: Let's say it goes to trial and since the population is 70 percent African American what do you think the jury pool will be???? I wouldn't want to take that chance. Wy I stay outa hinds county?!!!! You are guilty if you do something like that.
I live in Sharkey County. My wife works for the paper and covers every trial they have. The population is 70% black. The juries are never 70% black. The prosecution and defense prefer to have as many white people on the jury as possible, even when the defendent is black.

Of course there are few places like the South Delta, but it's a blanket statement to say that if you're in a majority black county you're automatically guilty.

Re: Missouri shooting thoughts??.

Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2014 8:12 pm
by Deltamud77
The governor of Missouri, who is the former AG, has called for vigrous PROSECUTION of the officer. Not investigation, but prosecution. Attorney General Eric Holder has the civil rights division of the justice department investigating this matter. If the officer is not indicted by the grand jury, which all evidence suggests he should not be, then I would be my last dollar that Holder indicts him in Federal Court.

We are living in perilous times, boys.

Re: Missouri shooting thoughts??.

Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2014 9:21 pm
by lilwhitelie
Deltamud77 wrote:The governor of Missouri, who is the former AG, has called for vigrous PROSECUTION of the officer. Not investigation, but prosecution. Attorney General Eric Holder has the civil rights division of the justice department investigating this matter. If the officer is not indicted by the grand jury, which all evidence suggests he should not be, then I would be my last dollar that Holder indicts him in Federal Court.

We are living in perilous times, boys.
Man for what these officers are paid and now seeing the governor saying the officer should be prosecuted....good lord I would quit if I was an officer. Maybe if all the officers resigned immediatedly then things may change. Imagine what the officers family is going through!!!! Officer had died by big mikes hand nothing would be on the news and no rioting. No way would I take on that job. Criminals have all the rights it seems. He wasn't a model citizen and 2 autopsy so show he did not have hands up but I am sure Eric holders autopsy will show what the people want and the poor cop will be imprisoned just to appease the rioting. Sad day

Re: Missouri shooting thoughts??.

Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2014 10:34 pm
by peewee
Well the MO governor just assured that I won't be turkey hunting there next year.

Re: Missouri shooting thoughts??.

Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2014 4:55 pm
by Denduke
Payless Shoe Store looted....They got ereything but da work boots....

Re: Missouri shooting thoughts??.

Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2014 5:25 pm
by lilwhitelie
southdeltan wrote:
lilwhitelie wrote: Let's say it goes to trial and since the population is 70 percent African American what do you think the jury pool will be???? I wouldn't want to take that chance. Wy I stay outa hinds county?!!!! You are guilty if you do something like that.
I live in Sharkey County. My wife works for the paper and covers every trial they have. The population is 70% black. The juries are never 70% black. The prosecution and defense prefer to have as many white people on the jury as possible, even when the defendent is black.

Of course there are few places like the South Delta, but it's a blanket statement to say that if you're in a majority black county you're automatically guilty.
A trial getting this much coverage....it would be majority minorities that's just the demographics. Same as would be in hinds county. The jury acquits him and immediately the names of the said jurors that held out are named and if they were white what do you think happens???. No rioting?? They fear for their family??? Pressure may push them to go along with what may not be right.