DuckSouth.com

nm

MSU had the tougher schedule ?? what kind of herb are yall smokin in south louisiana these days ??? i do believe between going against tennessee only twice and getting to play kentucky instead of South Carolina, you have 0 argument there.....

I believe your right. Something genespage or sixpackspeak came up with.

What did Kentucky win 5 games in the SEC.

rebelduckaholic wrote:What did Kentucky win 5 games in the SEC.

7 but who's counting.

Po Monkey Lounger wrote:hmmmmmmm ---all this smack coming from the same guy who predicted S. Head would flop this year and MSU would te the Rebs?????? You sure know your baseball GH22.

Are you the son of that idiot diaper salesman ---McClain, who posts on Gene's board???

Roy McClain? Hell no, stay away from tool's board as much as possible.

RebelYelp wrote:MSU had the tougher schedule ?? what kind of herb are yall smokin in south louisiana these days ??? i do believe between going against tennessee only twice and getting to play kentucky instead of South Carolina, you have 0 argument there.....

So you gonna make me go through all that work just to prove you wrong? 5 more wins in the sec by UM doesn't justify a #2 RPI ranking. How can UM be ahead of Florida, FSU and Miami when all 3 play each other several times during the season? That competition right there.

You are right whose counting. But still when Ole Miss deserves credit you can give them there credit, you dont have to bash. Come on you wont die.

Ole Miss deserves credit? Since when.........

I dislike Ole Miss with a passion, always have, always will. You will never see me say one good word about that school.

Well I am not going to knock State that bad. Whole family except me graduated there. So grew up going to watching State, I am the exception to the rule. But having gone to Ole Miss I will have to admit Oxford atmosphere is much better.

O yeah GH22 put something in that statement like I or maybe you should put undercover I LOVE Ole Miss

ok, first..... those other teams got to play kentucky, apparently you don't realize how far that will actually pull your RPI down

2nd, we won the series against UF, didn't play FSU and Miami, by the way, Miami was higher, until they 3 games this past weekend to clemson....

of the 3 teams seeded higher than us in the SEC tournament, we won the series against 2, went 1-2 against the other.

next... we were 7-5 against 4 teams ranked in the top 20 RPI, you were 5-11 against 5. (you played the same 4 teams we did, plus us, giving you 5, you were not in the top 20, so that gives us 4) even if you take the 4 losses to us out, and just leave the 4 common teams in the top 20, we were 7-5, you were 5-7.

we were 14-8 against 9 teams ranking 40-20 in RPI, you were 7-10 against 5.

that adds up to 22-13 against 13 teams in the top 40 for us; and 14-21 against 10 for you.... so not only did we have more wins, we had fewer losses. So we had a much better winning percentage against more opponents rated in the top 40.

In these games, we went 9-9 on the road, you went 5-12. to top 20 RPI teams, we were 5-4 on the road, you were 3-6

to teams we both played, we went 17-11, you went 14-13

Out of non-conference, we had 2 in the top 40, you had 1.

we were 6-4 in SEC series, you were 5-5, in our 4 losing series, we were not swept by anybody. In your 5, you were swept by us and Tennessee

Finally, you were 0-4 against us this year.

I really don't feel like adding up total wins and losses for our opponents, but if you want me to, i'll be glad to...

rebelduckaholic wrote:O yeah GH22 put something in that statement like I or maybe you should put undercover I LOVE Ole Miss

Lemme guess, there was a blank space between I and Ole Miss? This computer I'm on all the time has a major firewall setup on it, anything resembling a bad word in some form or fashion will be blocked out everytime.

RebelYelp wrote:ok, first..... those other teams got to play kentucky, apparently you don't realize how far that will actually pull your RPI down

2nd, we won the series against UF, didn't play FSU and Miami, by the way, Miami was higher, until they 3 games this past weekend to clemson....

of the 3 teams seeded higher than us in the SEC tournament, we won the series against 2, went 1-2 against the other.

next... we were 7-5 against 4 teams ranked in the top 20 RPI, you were 5-11 against 5. (you played the same 4 teams we did, plus us, giving you 5, you were not in the top 20, so that gives us 4) even if you take the 4 losses to us out, and just leave the 4 common teams in the top 20, we were 7-5, you were 5-7.

we were 14-8 against 9 teams ranking 40-20 in RPI, you were 7-10 against 5.

that adds up to 22-13 against 13 teams in the top 40 for us; and 14-21 against 10 for you.... so not only did we have more wins, we had fewer losses. So we had a much better winning percentage against more opponents rated in the top 40.

In these games, we went 9-9 on the road, you went 5-12. to top 20 RPI teams, we were 5-4 on the road, you were 3-6

to teams we both played, we went 17-11, you went 14-13

Out of non-conference, we had 2 in the top 40, you had 1.

we were 6-4 in SEC series, you were 5-5, in our 4 losing series, we were not swept by anybody. In your 5, you were swept by us and Tennessee

Finally, you were 0-4 against us this year.

I really don't feel like adding up total wins and losses for our opponents, but if you want me to, i'll be glad to...

Blah Blah Blah.......y'all will still choke. ....just like the Braves.

RebelYelp wrote:MSU had the tougher schedule ?? what kind of herb are yall smokin in south louisiana these days ??? i do believe between going against tennessee only twice and getting to play kentucky instead of South Carolina, you have 0 argument there.....

Well, you got to play State and we didn't.