DuckSouth.com

JimAire wrote:PoMonkey, you sound like a blame lawyer.

WHAT???? Po Monk's a lawyer? Get a rope.

JimAire wrote:Nobody has suggested to the MDWFP that a 200 buck fee be charged. There will not be any increase in WMA fees.

but he said "per WMA" so I was thinking that would be like leasing a hole in EACH WMA that you think you MIGHT hunt!!!!!!!

GO TO BED U HAVE A LOT OF MUD TO SUCK ! [/i]

John Ebanks wrote:GO TO BED U HAVE A LOT OF MUD TO SUCK ! [/i]

Stupid Enginners! I posted that ON watch!!!!!!

I see where ole Mud Bug made the big time. HEHEHE

Hey Jim where is that Petition that we are suppose to get?

MSDuckmen wrote:I see where ole Mud Bug made the big time. HEHEHE

BAWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
I'll have to figure on a way to get ya back MSDuckboy!

I am for both a shell limit and a ban on spinners. I think the shell limit should be as low as possible. I am all for 15 shells and would not be overly opposed to a 10 shell limit.

Just thought I would post up a word of encouragement to ya Jim,

I do not visit the General Discussion forum much any more due to the lack of usaful conservation. But this is a great thing you are doing, I would like to even see these same regulations enforces on all public land ( ACOE) included.

It has gotten to a point that with the spinners and other mechanicial devices that any one can get a duck within 50-60 yds of a spread, With unlimited shells and the light weight steel shot that most are using they blast away at these incredibally long shots and these ducks who are mortally wounded do not drop dead but fly off and die. We have all seen it numorus occasions.

By limiting the number of shells ( even if you go to 3 shots per bird for a 6 duck limit---18 total) and outlawing the use of mechanical decoys then I feel duck hunting over all would improve for every one.

My .02

Good deal Jim, I am about to mail my letter as we speak

I do not visit the General Discussion forum much any more due to the lack of usaful conservation

Hear, hear! The lack of usaful conservation is sickening!

I have always thought that communication was a two way deal. Those that complain about the topics of conversation, information, etc. are absolutely free to start their own threads about those very things. Thus, while on the surface such criticism can seem somewhat useful, it is actually a moot point since the cure to the problem often rests with the complainer himself. Those of us who choose to participate, by posting our opinions and exposing ourselves sometimes to ridicule or strong disagreement from others, should be the ones commended, as opposed to scolded. As to the lurkers who rarely post, and then when they do post they complain about other posters and the topics they discuss, I would say do something about it by posting yourself . We are not here for your entertainment.

haw'd damn po mokey.. if'n i'm ever on trail i want you to communicate for me.. your'd a good communicator and such..

your'd good with the kings english

I have always thought that communication was a two way deal. Those that complain about the topics of conversation, information, etc. are absolutely free to start their own threads about those very things. Thus, while on the surface such criticism can seem somewhat useful, it is actually a moot point since the cure to the problem often rests with the complainer himself. Those of us who choose to participate, by posting our opinions and exposing ourselves sometimes to ridicule or strong disagreement from others, should be the ones commended, as opposed to scolded. As to the lurkers who rarely post, and then when they do post they complain about other posters and the topics they discuss, I would say do something about it by posting yourself . We are not here for your entertainment.

Dang Monkey... We finally agree on something...
Good post.

Actually, Dan, we have been agreeing a lot lately. What has happened to you? Got a fever? Getting too soft?