Page 21 of 47
Re: SNOT vs. HAMMER
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 9:40 am
by lilwhitelie
trey wrote:Hammer,
Dont try advertising in the market bulletin either, I talked with the publisher a couple days ago and he said he is aware of your tactics and if you send him an advertisement he may make some changes to it... This is what he sent me!
We need fo membas fur our club... We gots lots a deeras...lukin fur a memba wit a disc
100acres at $62/acre... it's my auntie land and we tryin to sell it too... My family hunts its on mundas, wendys and sundae.. you can hunt tues, thrisdy and friday and satday! December 15 - January 1st no huntin allowed... Family reunion during that time!
THAT JUST MADE MY WEEKEND!!!!!!

Re: SNOT vs. HAMMER
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 9:46 am
by msbigdawg1234
term "self licking ice cream cone" comes to mind when i read your post.....
Re: SNOT vs. HAMMER
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 9:52 am
by Jeff
Still love this place
Re: SNOT vs. HAMMER
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 10:17 am
by MACDADDY
Re: SNOT vs. HAMMER
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 10:19 am
by deltadukman
Jeff wrote:Still love this place
As long as this post doesn't bring all the old douchebags from the MDWFP website over here and signing up and turn it into a powderroom. Im pretty sure though, that those guys would get their feeling hurt here.
Disclaimer: I am not saying that everyone who was on the mdwfp forum was a douchebag....but the tendencies ran rampant over there...if the shoe fits, wear it.
Re: SNOT vs. HAMMER
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 10:24 am
by remington1107
deltadukman wrote:Jeff wrote:Still love this place
As long as this post doesn't bring all the old douchebags from the MDWFP website over here and signing up and turn it into a powderroom. Im pretty sure though, that those guys would get their feeling hurt here.
Disclaimer: I am not saying that everyone who was on the mdwfp forum was a douchebag....but the tendencies ran rampant over there...if the shoe fits, wear it.
Like Tonyjr?? ha ha. I think goldacorn was on here reading this the other day. Not that he's a douchebag. remember his tagline "I love some white tail". I think my favorite was twinriver....hilarious!
Re: SNOT vs. HAMMER
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 10:40 am
by camlock
Best post of the whole thread! LOL
My opinion, is if you wanted to fight...you'd go fight...if you wanted to sue, you'd get a lawyer...none of which requires internet blabber!
I talk alot of SH on this website, but I don't wanna fight none of you...if I did, this website ain't where you would find out about it!

Re: SNOT vs. HAMMER
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 10:47 am
by duramax
Kylesandidge wrote:DEAR T Logan ""BEARDED CLAM"" RUSSEL, Hammer it is not a control freak that we worry about it is the con artist you are. I am sick of hearing your punk !@# mouth and I hope you are in the same work building because I am on my way up there to settle this. Has nothing to do with the 172 inch deer that you DID NOIT KILL, AND THAT YOU HOLD SO CLOSELY TOO. The deer was killed great deer and congrats to the hunter!! NOT YOUR !@#@ booty. The argument everyone had with you is that once the deer was killed you told everyone that it was not the same deer as the one you had on photos to manipulate people into your BRHC. Like I said @#@? U!!!!!!! As always your friend browndog
I want to know what has come of this. Hammer needs a film crew to follow him around. He attracts so much drama they could make a reality show about him.
Re: SNOT vs. HAMMER
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 10:58 am
by Hammer
SHOUT OUT TO DUTCH DOG: I got a bunch of current and past members of BRHC trying to get registered for DUCKSOUTH so they can jump onto this thread and straighten it out. So far they are not hearing back from the Admin on their registrations. Please expedite the registrations!
Also I saw a post by somebody named DUCKHUNT or HUNTDUCK or something like that on this thread last night where he said he had known me a long time, that I was a standup guy, that unless you know me, you dont know me and that he could not beleive the crap being posted about me but now I cant seem to find his post. Please advise as to what page it is on if you have seen it.
SHOUT OUT TO KEITH/KYLE SANDRIDGE: You attacked me on the MDWFP forum saying the 2006 photo came off a different piece of land. I produced the 2007 photo and disproved that. Now you are saying that the reason I did not beleive the buck killed in 2008 was the same buck as that photoed in 2006 and 2007 is because I wanted to create the illusion that buck was still alive so I could lure guys in the club? You give me way too much credit for dreaming up scams. Two different biologists say he is the same deer in all three photos but I did not believe it until I took the photos to them and asked them.
REGARDING THE BRHC RULES: What has been posted is a draft set of rules that I floated to the guys to see what they thought. By not removing some of those members names, yall have brought them into this now. I am sure they will be glad to learn of that. For the record, we did not buy the office trailer (which was only 8'x32' and thus required some rationing for naps and sleep times). Instead I rented a great little 2BR, 1 BA house near the lease. Another example of my under promising and over delivering and we did bow hunt beginning October 1. I am tempted to post my rules for this year but to heck with it- it really is none of your business as several of the more mature posters have noted. BTW, Kyle, removing the copyright information does not relieve you of copyright responsibilities. You have published my copyrighted materials and that is a yet another tort you have committed agaisnt me.
NICK (REMINGTON): We wil bow hunt straight on through the early PW season. That is not in the rules yet but I hvae talked to enough members to know that is the majority decision. And no I have never shot a deer of anykind illegally except back in 1991 when I first moved back to MS from elk guiding in Colorado and they changed the rules on a piece of ground I had hunted for years from rifles to shotgun only. I did not know about the change and got written up for it (shot him with a open sight 30-30). COst me a few bucks but I got to keep the deer. That's it- no trespassing deer, no road deer, no night deer, no rifle during muzzleopader, etc deer, no biated deer (I dont own a feeder of any kind), no closed area on refuge deer, no out of season deer. Not only have I never killed adeer under any of those circumstances but I have never hunted deer under any of those circumstances.
Have you guys notieced how the tide is turning on public opinion on this? More mature posers are coming and saying (a) the Sandridge boys cause trouble on websites everywhere (b) our rules are our business (c) and surely a broken weld on a disc cant be that big of a deal. Keep watching fellas once the current and past members get in here things are gonna get real interesting for the guys attacking me. It's one thing to not like a guy but to call him a liar and a cheat, a con and a sham, question his faith and tell hiim how to raise his chrldren. That is going way, way, way too far. Lets put it this way: that is beyond fighting words. Speaking of fighting, I am still waiting to hear back from SNOT. Come on Trevor Wall, brother of Roe Wall, you who that started this mess up again, Man up- met me in the ring for three rounds of the sound and the fury!
Re: SNOT vs. HAMMER
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 10:58 am
by Hammer
You guys went through my entire rules and all you could pick on was (a) clubhouse arrangements for a clubhouse we did not even buy/use (b) when we started bow hunting which the guys voted down such that we started on October 1 just like everybody else? Surely yall can do better than that for a control freak such as myself!!!!
Not a single one of the Logan haters figured out that 550 acres of woods and 350 acres of fields iwth a walkng trail, a daycare, a state highway and a busy county road means somebody DAMN well better be a control freak so no innocent gets hurt or killed. I waked up at night in a cold sweat sometimes thinking about a bullet ricocheting into that day care or across the road into a car passing by. You bet your booty that I am constanly thinking of how we can be safer with our rules!!!
Give you an example: I had never seen a Summit Lifeline until last year. THey are now MANDATORY on all lock on stands. CONTROL FREAK? THat is one way to put it if you are stupid, immature sack of shirt punk ass kid. But a grown man says, "You know what? That makes sense."
Getting back to the pics Kyle. You got busted on your original lie so now you are changing your tune. You and Nick originally said the photo was taken from another property and used to lure guys to BRHC. I blew that out of the water when I produced the 2007 photo so now you are coming back with this crap that I said it was two different bucks meangin the 2006 buck was still alive.That is complete crap! My thought was that the 2006 buck was 6.5 years old or older when photoed and that the 2008 buck was his son or younger brother. I have studied those photos very closely and still I am not convinced but never in my wildest imagination did I think or SAY TO ANYBODY, join BRHC cause this buck (2006 or 2007 photo) is still alive. Besides what makes your entire logic so completely stupid is the guy that killed 2008 buck, called me up two weeks later and said he had seen a buck so big that he made the one he killed look average.
HEY KYLE/KEITH/SNOT/NICK: When are the black helicopters comeing to get you? Yall are pathetic with your Logan hating conspiracy theories!
Re: SNOT vs. HAMMER
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 11:06 am
by camlock
man, this is better than the Bachelor!

Re: SNOT vs. HAMMER
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 11:10 am
by duramax
Hammer wrote:SHOUT OUT TO DUTCH DOG: I got a bunch of current and past members of BRHC trying to get registered for DUCKSOUTH so they can jump onto this thread and straighten it out. So far they are not hearing back from the Admin on their registrations. Please expedite the registrations!
Also I saw a post by somebody named DUCKHUNT or HUNTDUCK or something like that on this thread last night where he said he had known me a long time, that I was a standup guy, that unless you know me, you dont know me and that he could not beleive the crap being posted about me but now I cant seem to find his post. Please advise as to what page it is on if you have seen it.
SHOUT OUT TO KEITH/KYLE SANDRIDGE: You attacked me on the MDWFP forum saying the 2006 photo came off a different piece of land. I produced the 2007 photo and disproved that. Now you are saying that the reason I did not beleive the buck killed in 2008 was the same buck as that photoed in 2006 and 2007 is because I wanted to create the illusion that buck was still alive so I could lure guys in the club? You give me way too much credit for dreaming up scams. Two different biologists say he is the same deer in all three photos but I did not believe it until I took the photos to them and asked them.
REGARDING THE BRHC RULES: What has been posted is a draft set of rules that I floated to the guys to see what they thought. By not removing some of those members names, yall have brought them into this now. I am sure they will be glad to learn of that. For the record, we did not buy the office trailer (which was only 8'x32' and thus required some rationing for naps and sleep times). Instead I rented a great little 2BR, 1 BA house near the lease. Another example of my under promising and over delivering and we did bow hunt beginning October 1. I am tempted to post my rules for this year but to heck with it- it really is none of your business as several of the more mature posters have noted. BTW, Kyle, removing the copyright information does not relieve you of copyright responsibilities. You have published my copyrighted materials and that is a yet another tort you have committed agaisnt me.
NICK (REMINGTON): We wil bow hunt straight on through the early PW season. That is not in the rules yet but I hvae talked to enough members to know that is the majority decision.
Have you notieced how the tide is turning on public opinion on this? More mature posers are coming and saying (a) the Sandridge boys cause trouble on websites everywhere (b) our rules are our business (c) and surely a broken weld on a disc cant be that big of a deal. Keep watching fellas once the current and past members get in here things are gonna get real interesting for the guys attacking me. It's one thing to not like a guy but to call him a liar and a cheat, a con and a sham, question his faith and tell hiim how to raise his chrldren. That is going way, way, way too far. Lets put it this way: that is beyond fighting words. Speaking of fighting, I am still waiting to hear back from SNOT. Come on Trevor Wall, brother of Roe Wall, the SOB that started this mess up again, Man up- met me in the ring for three rounds of the sound and the fury!

Re: SNOT vs. HAMMER
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 11:25 am
by ducman77
More Please....
Re: SNOT vs. HAMMER
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 11:26 am
by deltadukman
Hammer....I say this in the most well protected and copyrighted way:
Dont be bringing all those MDWFP clowns over here and bringing "IT" and that BullNoodler website BS over here. We were fine without them and will be better without all their superiorority, self righteousness, and whining azzes....just going ahead and throwing that out there. If that happens, this place will become a dump like those.
Carry on...but remember....I'm copyrighted bieotch!
Re: SNOT vs. HAMMER
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 11:26 am
by vicksburg
I hate to say it, ...
...but i freaking love this place!
