DuckSouth.com

I cannot believe this hasn't been posted - maybe this site really is dying.

http://kingfish1935.blogspot.com/2015/0 ... ooter.html

Gutta Life Dee

http://kingfish1935.blogspot.com/2015/0 ... e-dee.html

In short, thugs target and carjack a white male in nicest neighborhood in Jackson. He turns out to be a competition pistol shooter. He kills Gutta Life Dee.

I am pleased the Dr. made it out of the situation alive. This could have gone terrible bad for him quickly. Always have a gun on you if allowed.

Hate that the other one didn't get a few rounds as well

maverick21 wrote:Hate that the other one didn't get a few rounds as well

That's what I thought as well.

I have been out on the range all weekend and just now getting caught up with the story.. There will be lots of people in the gun community around here that know him and on another message board they are saying (and rightly so) not to name, names and discuss to much.. Regardless of the situation, taking someone's life has got to weigh on your mind. Lot's of people want to know why he "let the other one get away". But IMO he did the right thing and didn't fire what may have been a retreating threat.

I think it will be interesting in the long run to hear what he thought he did wrong and what he thought he did right in this situation from a self defense perspective.

I work from home and I always carry whenever I leave the house, but over the last few months I have started home carrying too.. Now I keep it on from Dawn till I get in bed for the night..

cwink wrote:but over the last few months I have started home carrying too.. Now I keep it on from Dawn till I get in bed for the night..

Same here.

cwink wrote:I have been out on the range all weekend and just now getting caught up with the story.. There will be lots of people in the gun community around here that know him and on another message board they are saying (and rightly so) not to name, names and discuss to much.. Regardless of the situation, taking someone's life has got to weigh on your mind. Lot's of people want to know why he "let the other one get away". But IMO he did the right thing and didn't fire what may have been a retreating threat.

I think it will be interesting in the long run to hear what he thought he did wrong and what he thought he did right in this situation from a self defense perspective.

I work from home and I always carry whenever I leave the house, but over the last few months I have started home carrying too.. Now I keep it on from Dawn till I get in bed for the night..

lets say he did shoot the other one but he survived but is paralyzed. It is proven he was running away and was shot in the back and was no longer a threat and possibly he wasn't armed but the one that is dead was armed. How does this play out in the courtroom?? Remember this is Hinds county. The shooter ends up no longer being a victim especially when Al gets hold of it. Just wouldn't like my chances on that jury with all that's happening today. Someone has to be the sacrifice. Baltimore is a prime example. Just seems the criminals have more rights than honest folks these days.

Reports are that runaway joe being charged with capital murder under the felony murder rule.

How's that grab you?

gps4 wrote:Reports are that runaway joe being charged with capital murder under the felony murder rule.

How's that grab you?

Yeah, that's one of the messed up laws in our justice system. That being said, I'm going to sleep pretty good tonight I reckon.

lilwhitelie wrote:

cwink wrote:I have been out on the range all weekend and just now getting caught up with the story.. There will be lots of people in the gun community around here that know him and on another message board they are saying (and rightly so) not to name, names and discuss to much.. Regardless of the situation, taking someone's life has got to weigh on your mind. Lot's of people want to know why he "let the other one get away". But IMO he did the right thing and didn't fire what may have been a retreating threat.

I think it will be interesting in the long run to hear what he thought he did wrong and what he thought he did right in this situation from a self defense perspective.

I work from home and I always carry whenever I leave the house, but over the last few months I have started home carrying too.. Now I keep it on from Dawn till I get in bed for the night..

lets say he did shoot the other one but he survived but is paralyzed. It is proven he was running away and was shot in the back and was no longer a threat and possibly he wasn't armed but the one that is dead was armed. How does this play out in the courtroom?? Remember this is Hinds county. The shooter ends up no longer being a victim especially when Al gets hold of it. Just wouldn't like my chances on that jury with all that's happening today. Someone has to be the sacrifice. Baltimore is a prime example. Just seems the criminals have more rights than honest folks these days.

I do care what the law says, I hope I never have to be put in that situation. but I would have shot the 2nd dude, I don't care if he was 150 yds running away...

The criminal was a threat before he even kidnapped the guy - its obvious he was TARGETED - the criminals already knew where he lived, that he had a lot of money, and merchandise, and a big house - I mean there aren't any cheap houses on East over drive.

Since he was already targeted for being a successful person who live in a nice house - don't you think the other (still alive) gangster could possibly come back for revenge for you shooting his buddy "Gutta Life Dee"??



I don't know about yall, But I am not looking over my shoulder the rest of my days,

I couldn't sleep at night know the same people that stuck a gun to my head and robbed me blind was out there potentially targeting the house where my family sleeps......AGAIN The thugs already mentioned what they would do to his wife..... and they obviously aren't scared to follow though with there intentions - I mean the robbed a competition pistol shooter who was armed on his way to the gun range..........

gps4 wrote:Reports are that runaway joe being charged with capital murder under the felony murder rule.

How's that grab you?

How does that work?

jdbuckshot wrote:I do care what the law says, I hope I never have to be put in that situation. but I would have shot the 2nd dude, I don't care if he was 150 yds running away...................

........................don't you think the other (still alive) gangster could possibly come back for revenge for you shooting his buddy "Gutta Life Dee"??

Agreed
There really should be some carry over law from law enforcement's rule of being able to shoot a fleeing suspect if that person is a threat to the community.

the felony murder rules says that if you are committing a felony and someone dies, you are responsible for the death. Most forms of murder require an intent to commit death. Felony murder only requires the intent to commit the felony. During the course of the felony, any homicide will be considered murder, whether it’s intentional or accidental. guy breaks in my house. in the chaos that ensues, i "accidentally" shoot my wife. the burglar goes up on capital murder charge for death of my wife, even though he didn't shoot her.

in this instance both guys are involved in the kidnapping, which is an inherently dangerous felony. during the kidnapping, dirty dee was killed. the other guy involved in the kidnapping is legally culpable for the death of his buddy.

the purpose for the felony murder rule is to deter people from engaging in felonies knowing that they can be liable for the actions of their partners.

personally, i think it is a good law to have.

gps4 wrote:the felony murder rules says that if you are committing a felony and someone dies, you are responsible for the death. Most forms of murder require an intent to commit death. Felony murder only requires the intent to commit the felony. During the course of the felony, any homicide will be considered murder, whether it’s intentional or accidental. guy breaks in my house. in the chaos that ensues, i "accidentally" shoot my wife. the burglar goes up on capital murder charge for death of my wife, even though he didn't shoot her.

in this instance both guys are involved in the kidnapping, which is an inherently dangerous felony. during the kidnapping, dirty dee was killed. the other guy involved in the kidnapping is legally culpable for the death of his buddy.

the purpose for the felony murder rule is to deter people from engaging in felonies knowing that they can be liable for the actions of their partners.

personally, i think it is a good law to have.

That sounds good to me too.

It has its place, but it can go too far.
http://abcnews.go.com/US/controversial- ... d=24710849