Page 1 of 1
First Hoseman article I have seen.
Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2015 10:49 am
by peewee
Re: First Hoseman article I have seen.
Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2015 11:25 pm
by mshunter77
I want to know how they came up with the over $700,000 part. I assume that means it is close to $700,000 which would put it in the $2,400 to 2,500 an acre range. I am guessing on the open market that land would go for much more than that.
Re: First Hoseman article I have seen.
Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2015 12:29 am
by Don Miller
Not under a public waterway. $500 to $600 an acre.
Re: First Hoseman article I have seen.
Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2015 7:06 am
by hntrpat1
Don Miller wrote:Not under a public waterway. $500 to $600 an acre.
well it seems to me the idiots along the ms river don't understand that.
Re: First Hoseman article I have seen.
Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2015 7:39 am
by peewee
hntrpat1 wrote:Don Miller wrote:Not under a public waterway. $500 to $600 an acre.
well it seems to me the idiots along the ms river don't understand that.
I know in the past it was appraised lower in the river. The landowners still have to pay taxes on that ground which is useless unless you can dredge sand or something from it. If the landowners had to pay taxes on land that valued the same as timbered ground I could forsee a quick lawsuit coming against said county.
Re: First Hoseman article I have seen.
Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2015 9:58 am
by Don Miller
ttt
Re: First Hoseman article I have seen.
Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2015 2:41 pm
by mshunter77
Don Miller wrote:Not under a public waterway. $500 to $600 an acre.
Gotcha.
Re: First Hoseman article I have seen.
Posted: Sun Sep 06, 2015 3:25 pm
by Don Miller
ttt