Page 1 of 2

College Football News SEC Unit Rankings

Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2005 6:30 pm
by rebelduckaholic
2005 SEC Offense Unit Rankings

Offenses
1. LSU
2. Tennessee
3. Florida
4. Georgia
5. Arkansas
6. Auburn
7. Ole Miss
8. Alabama
9. South Carolina
10. Vanderbilt
11. Kentucky
12. Mississippi St

Quarterbacks
1. Tennessee
2. Florida
3. LSU
4. Georgia
5. Vanderbilt
6. Alabama
7. Ole Miss
8. Arkansas
9. Kentucky
10. Auburn
11. South Carolina
12. Mississippi St

Running Backs
1. LSU
2. Georgia
3. Tennessee
4. Alabama
5. Florida
6. Arkansas
7. Auburn
8. South Carolina
9. Mississippi St
10. Ole Miss
11. Kentucky
12. Vanderbilt

Receivers
1. LSU
2. Tennessee
3. Florida
4. Auburn
5. Arkansas
6. Ole Miss
7. Kentucky
8. Georgia
9. Vanderbilt
10. Alabama
11. South Carolina
12. Mississippi St

Offensive Line
1. Georgia
2. LSU
3. Arkansas
4. Florida
5. Tennessee
6. South Carolina
7. Auburn
8. Ole Miss
9. Mississippi St
10. Alabama
11. Kentucky
12. Vanderbilt

2005 SEC Defense & Kicker Unit Rankings

Defenses
1. Alabama
2. Tennessee
3. Auburn
4. LSU
5. Georgia
6. Florida
7. South Carolina
8. Ole Miss
9. Mississippi St
10. Kentucky
11. Arkansas
12. Vanderbilt

Defensive Line
1. Auburn
2. Tennessee
3. LSU
4. Alabama
5. Florida
6. Georgia
7. Ole Miss
8. Arkansas
9. South Carolina
10. Mississippi St
11. Kentucky
12. Vanderbilt

Linebackers
1. Auburn
2. Alabama
3. Tennessee
4. LSU
5. Georgia
6. Florida
7. South Carolina
8. Ole Miss
9. Mississippi St
10. Vanderbilt
11. Arkansas
12. Kentucky

Secondary
1. Alabama
2. South Carolina
3. Georgia
4. LSU
5. Tennessee
6. Florida
7. Kentucky
8. Auburn
9. Ole Miss
10. Arkansas
11. Mississippi St
12. Vanderbilt

Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2005 6:32 pm
by Greenhead22
That my friend, is a joke. :lol:

Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2005 6:33 pm
by rebelduckaholic
I will have to say whoever wrote this for collegefootball news is an idiot. Norwood the #9 running back. Which happens to be the only spot Mstate is rated higher than UM. Connor bringing up the rear on quarter backs where UM does not even know their definate starter. I just thought this was kinda funny. :lol: :lol:

Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2005 6:34 pm
by rebelduckaholic
You beat me to the punch. It is definately a joke :lol: :lol:

Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2005 6:42 pm
by Greenhead22
Norwood, 1st team all-sec on every list, #9 back in the sec? :roll: :roll:

And I know good and well that Conner isn't the worst QB in the sec.

Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2005 6:43 pm
by rebelduckaholic
Even a UM fan can admit that :lol:

Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2005 6:48 pm
by Greenhead22
MSU probably has the most talented DL and LB core in the SEC, 9th and 10th, come on. :roll:

Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2005 9:39 pm
by mudsucker
quit crying you babies! :roll:

Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2005 9:41 pm
by Greenhead22
This happens to be an A and B conversation.....so C your way out of it. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2005 5:57 am
by rebelduckaholic
Just Laughing here :lol:

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2005 7:25 am
by RebelYelp
all i can say is their reasoning for the # 9 RB ranking is that past norwood there's no depth ??? i honestly don't know, i would think norwood himself woudl warrant higher than a 9 ranking

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2005 9:03 am
by bigwater
to quote rick james..


cocaine is a poweful drug!!!! :lol:

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2005 10:37 am
by webbmaster
It's not ranking the RBs individually.

Its ranking is for the entire offensive unit. RB being one unit.

u·nit n.
A group regarded as a distinct entity within a larger group.



Who are the other RBs for State? If the rest of them suck, it's no wonder they are 9th.

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:00 pm
by Greenhead22
Well, we've got 2 redshirt freshmen as backups that chose MSU over Bama. :lol:

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:06 pm
by webbmaster
So, in other words you have 2 backups with zero experience.

You do know how to equate the average of something, don't you? :lol: