Page 1 of 1
FOR THE RECORD
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 7:14 pm
by Hayes
FOR THE RECORD LETS SEE THE ECONOMY IS GROWING AT A UNBEILVABLE RATE SO MUCH THE GREENSPAN HAD TO RAISE INTREST RATES. UNEMPLYMENT IS AT ITS LOWEST POINT ANYONE CAN REMEMBER, AND WE HAVE NOT BEEN ATTACKED SINCE SEP 11 SUDDAM IS CAPTURED, BUT BUSH IS A BAD PRESIDENT. O OK.
WHAT IS NOT BEING TOLD BY THE LEFT WING MEDIA IDIOTS IS WE ALSO HAVE FOREIGN AIRLINES THAT BUY THE RIGHTS TO THE TERMINALS AND LAND AND FLY IN IN OUR TERMINALS. SUCH ARLINES COME OUT OF SAUDIA ARABIA AND OTHER MIDDLE EASTERN COUNTRIES. THAT DOES NOT MEAN THEY OWN THE SECURITY TO THESE AIRLINES THEY OWN THE RIGHTS TO USE THE TERMINALS. NOW WITH THE SEA PORTS MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT UNITED STATES WOULD STILL CONTROL THE SECURITY TO THE PORTS.
NOW IM NOT SAYING IM FOR BUSH'S PLAN BECAUSE I THINK ALL PORTS AND TERMINALS AND EVERYTHING OUT TO BE OWNED AND RUNNED BY AMERICANS, BUT I DO SEE WHERE HE IS COMING FROM.
THE ECONOMY IS GROWING AND UNEMPLOYEMENT IS AT A LOWEST BECAUSE OF BUSH'S TAX PLAN. THERE ARE MANY CRITICS THAT SAY BUSH CUTTS TAXES FOR THE WEALTHY WELL HERE IS A STAT FOR YOU 5% OF THE RICH PAY 95% OF AMERICAS TAXES LET ME PUT THAT IN TERMS YOU CAN UNDERSTAND ONLY 5% OF TAXES COMES FROM MIDDLE CLASS AND LOWER CLASS CITIZENS AND THE OTHER 95% COMES FROM THE RICHEST 5%. WHEN YOU CUTT TAXES FOR THE RICH YOU PUT MONEY BACK IN THERE POCKET TO SPEND AND WITH THAT MONEY THE CREATE MORE JOBS.
Re: FOR THE RECORD
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 7:16 pm
by Money
Hayes wrote:FOR THE RECORD LETS SEE THE ECONOMY IS GROWING AT A UNBEILVABLE RATE SO MUCH THE GREENSPAN HAD TO RAISE INTREST RATES. UNEMPLYMENT IS AT ITS LOWEST POINT ANYONE CAN REMEMBER, AND WE HAVE NOT BEEN ATTACKED SINCE SEP 11 SUDDAM IS CAPTURED, BUT BUSH IS A BAD PRESIDENT. O OK.
WHAT IS NOT BEING TOLD BY THE LEFT WING MEDIA IDIOTS IS WE ALSO HAVE FOREIGN AIRLINES THAT BUY THE RIGHTS TO THE TERMINALS AND LAND AND FLY IN IN OUR TERMINALS. SUCH ARLINES COME OUT OF SAUDIA ARABIA AND OTHER MIDDLE EASTERN COUNTRIES. THAT DOES NOT MEAN THEY OWN THE SECURITY TO THESE AIRLINES THEY OWN THE RIGHTS TO USE THE TERMINALS. NOW WITH THE SEA PORTS MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT UNITED STATES WOULD STILL CONTROL THE SECURITY TO THE PORTS.
NOW IM NOT SAYING IM FOR BUSH'S PLAN BECAUSE I THINK ALL PORTS AND TERMINALS AND EVERYTHING OUT TO BE OWNED AND RUNNED BY AMERICANS, BUT I DO SEE WHERE HE IS COMING FROM.
THE ECONOMY IS GROWING AND UNEMPLOYEMENT IS AT A LOWEST BECAUSE OF BUSH'S TAX PLAN. THERE ARE MANY CRITICS THAT SAY BUSH CUTTS TAXES FOR THE WEALTHY WELL HERE IS A STAT FOR YOU 5% OF THE RICH PAY 95% OF AMERICAS TAXES LET ME PUT THAT IN TERMS YOU CAN UNDERSTAND ONLY 5% OF TAXES COMES FROM MIDDLE CLASS AND LOWER CLASS CITIZENS AND THE OTHER 95% COMES FROM THE RICHEST 5%. WHEN YOU CUTT TAXES FOR THE RICH YOU PUT MONEY BACK IN THERE POCKET TO SPEND AND WITH THAT MONEY THE CREATE MORE JOBS.
by god.
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 9:18 pm
by feather
DANGED SKIPPY!!!
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 9:52 pm
by duck warrior
good post hayes
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 8:19 am
by Caller1
Bring it to the soap box!!!
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 9:10 am
by regishay
im going to say one thing about unemployment, they only count the ones that are recieving the unemployment benifits, so when thier benifits run out they are not counted anymore. It doesnt mean they found a job, so to say the unemployment is at its lowest is kinda a catch 22, it just means that we are not laying off as many people.
i am going to say one thing too...
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 9:27 am
by micscottj
that is incorrect. unemployment is a measure of all people who are looking for jobs. it has nothing to do with a person't enrollment in unemployment. the only time a person with out a job is no longer considered unemployed is if they stop looking for a job.
you ask how they know someone has stopped looking for a job? how the hell do i know. estimates i suppose. how do they know gdp or anything else for that matter, but they certainly aren't doing head counts.
Re: i am going to say one thing too...
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 9:36 am
by regishay
micscottj wrote:that is incorrect. unemployment is a measure of all people who are looking for jobs. it has nothing to do with a person't enrollment in unemployment. the only time a person with out a job is no longer considered unemployed is if they stop looking for a job.
you ask how they know someone has stopped looking for a job? how the hell do i know. estimates i suppose. how do they know gdp or anything else for that matter, but they certainly aren't doing head counts.
take it from some that went thru that crap, i use to work at worldCom, yeap got layed off. When your unemployed you have all the time in the world to do stuff, I had a lot of time on my hands, visited the unemployment office more than once. I asked about how they figured out the unemployment figures,they said from the benifits that were being paid out, but once you stop getting the benifit they send out questionaires asking if you found work, but most folks dont acutally send them back. so the figures are off by alot from what the lady at the umemployment office said, cause the figures are coming from questionaires.
Re: FOR THE RECORD
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 11:15 am
by MemphisStockBroker
Hayes wrote:WHAT IS NOT BEING TOLD BY THE LEFT WING MEDIA IDIOTS IS WE ALSO HAVE FOREIGN AIRLINES THAT BUY THE RIGHTS TO THE TERMINALS AND LAND AND FLY IN IN OUR TERMINALS. SUCH ARLINES COME OUT OF SAUDIA ARABIA AND OTHER MIDDLE EASTERN COUNTRIES. .
I am not sure that statement is true. I dont know of ANY direct flights out of the middle east that lands in the USA. And foreign carriers can only land at certain terminals. They do not have rights to airspace other than to port citices like Atlanta, Chicago & NYC. They can not fly from the port into any other US city.
And unless I am TOTALLY mistaken, there are no middle east flagship aircraft flying into the USA.
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 6:43 pm
by Hayes
according to sean hannity there are several saudia arabia owned and other middle eastern owned airlines that buy the terminal rights and land in some of our air ports I do not know for sure I have not done the reseach myself on that
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 9:42 pm
by torch
The answer lies in biodiesel and E85 ethanol. Then the middle east countries can fight and kill each other for all I care.
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 10:13 pm
by rebelduckaholic
E85 needs to be pushed in more cities. It can run on most vehicles. It is only in the big cities and there are only a few where there are some
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2006 7:38 am
by Hayes
not up to date with E85 elaboate for me please.